Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 14:31
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why is there a lack of affordable housing in the USA despite a surplus of empty homes?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Illum autem fuga doloremque est quod delectus id.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Mya Lesnar, daughter to WWE legend Brock Lesnar, wins national title in shot put - ESPN
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The No. 1 Supplement Causing Dangerous Liver Damage, Doctors Warn - bestlifeonline.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Discovery of a Lifetime: Student Discovers Ancient “Living Fossil” Underneath Rock - SciTechDaily
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Non est eum facere impedit aut dignissimos tempora.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is it considered rude to comment on someone's weight? Is it simply stating a fact?